There is a moment in every war when somebody has to ask a very simple question:
Where does this end?
Because right now, the war involving the United States and Iran isn’t staying neatly inside Iran.
It’s spreading.
And the next place America could find itself fighting is Yemen.
Saudi Arabia is fighting the Houthis, an Iran-backed movement that has controlled Yemen’s capital for years. And in recent weeks, the Houthis have made major territorial gains. They’ve seized Yemen’s Red Sea coast and moved into strategically important territory around the Bab al-Mandab Strait—one of the most important shipping passages on Earth. Reuters reports they’re now fighting for strategic high ground that could further consolidate those gains. (Reuters)
And Saudi Arabia wants help.
According to current reporting, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has repeatedly pressed President Trump for direct American military intervention.
And apparently, we came incredibly close.
The New York Times reported that Trump initially didn’t favor attacking the Houthis. Then, after speaking with the Saudi crown prince, he instructed the Pentagon to prepare strikes.
Targets were selected.
Aircraft were being prepared.
Bombs were reportedly being loaded.
And then Trump called it off.
At least for now.
Reuters says it has not independently verified those details, and U.S. Central Command did not immediately confirm the Times account. (Reuters)
But here’s where this gets fascinating.
The Houthis are essentially telling America:
We don’t want to fight you.
American officials reportedly met Houthi representatives in Oman earlier this month. According to Reuters’ sources, the Houthis said they intended to honor their cease-fire with the United States and wouldn’t attack American vessels. (Reuters)
At the same time, they’re attacking Saudi Arabia.
They’ve claimed missile and drone attacks on Riyadh and on Saudi energy infrastructure. Reuters documented flames and a huge plume of smoke near Riyadh’s airport after the latest attacks, although precisely what was hit wasn’t immediately clear. (Reuters)
So imagine sitting in the White House Situation Room.
Saudi Arabia says:
“We’re your ally. Help us.”
The Houthis effectively say:
“Stay out of this and we’ll stay away from you.”
And the Pentagon has to think about something else:
What happens the morning after America starts bombing?
Because we’ve tried bombing the Houthis before.
And they’re still here.
So the real question isn’t:
Can America destroy Houthi targets?
Of course it can.
The question is:
What political objective does that accomplish?
And what happens afterward?
Because once American bombs fall, the Houthis may decide their agreement not to attack American ships is over.
And that’s where this becomes a global economic story.
Pull up a map.
You’ve got the Strait of Hormuz on one side of the Arabian Peninsula.
You’ve got the Bab al-Mandab on the other.
Those are two enormously important arteries for international energy and shipping.
And both are under severe pressure simultaneously.
Reuters reports that before the current Iran war, roughly 125 large commercial vessels a day normally passed through Hormuz. Over this past weekend, just 17 commodity vessels were recorded making the transit. Traffic through Bab al-Mandab has declined as well. (Reuters)
That’s not some abstract foreign-policy seminar.
That’s oil.
That’s diesel.
That’s transportation.
That’s manufacturing.
That’s shipping.
That’s ultimately prices paid by ordinary people thousands of miles away from the battlefield.
Saudi Arabia has another problem.
Houthi attacks on its East-West pipeline have pushed Saudi Aramco to move more oil back through Hormuz—the very waterway Saudi Arabia has historically wanted alternative routes around.
Reuters reports that 22 tankers carrying about 42 million barrels of crude exited Hormuz during the week beginning September 13. (Reuters)
Think about the irony.
Instability around one shipping route pushes your oil toward another shipping route that’s already unstable.
That’s how regional wars become global economic problems.
And there’s another piece of this story that shouldn’t disappear behind the missiles and geopolitics:
Yemenis are paying the price.
The United Nations says the latest fighting has killed hundreds of people and driven more than 120,000 Yemenis from their homes. (Reuters)
These are families.
People trying to get their kids somewhere safe.
People who probably couldn’t care less about Washington’s strategy, Tehran’s strategy, Riyadh’s strategy or anybody else’s strategy.
They just want to survive.
So now President Trump faces a genuinely difficult strategic choice.
Saudi Arabia is an important American partner and is asking for assistance.
The Houthis control strategically important territory and are attacking Saudi targets.
But they’re also signaling that they don’t currently want direct conflict with the United States.
Meanwhile, the United States is already engaged in a much larger confrontation with Iran.
There isn’t an obvious, cost-free answer here.
Military intervention carries risks.
Staying out carries risks.
Diplomacy carries uncertainty.
And doing nothing doesn’t necessarily mean nothing happens.
But there’s one question worth asking before opening another front:
What exactly are we trying to achieve?
Not what can we bomb.
Not what can we destroy.
Not what can we accomplish by Tuesday.
What’s the endgame?
Because America has learned this lesson in the Middle East before:
Starting military operations can happen in a matter of hours.
Ending them can take years.
And sometimes the most consequential decision a president makes isn’t whether America has enough military power to enter another war.
It’s whether entering that war will actually produce the outcome America wants.
Right now, with bombs reportedly having come close to leaving American aircraft for Yemen, that question isn’t theoretical anymore.
It’s sitting on the president’s desk.
Join the Conversation